Dotson filed the underlying FDCPA actions in the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, alleging he is a “consumer” as defined by the FDCPA, 15 U.S.C. ‘communicating or threatening to communicate to any person credit information which is known or which should be known to be false, including the failure to communicate that a disputed debt is disputed.” Id. “Conduct that is a violation of this prohibition includes. I “The FDCPA prohibits a debt collector from using ‘any false, deceptive, or misleading representation or means in connection with the collection of any debt.’” Llewellyn v.
We consolidated the appeals for disposition. Dotson lacked standing as an assignee to bring these actions.
AWA COLLECTIONS SCAMS PRO
Appellate Case: 22-6078 Document: 010110848335 Date Filed: Page: 2 _ Vance Dotson, proceeding pro se,1 appeals the district court’s dismissal of these actions brought under the Fair Debt Consumer Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. * After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. _ ORDER AND JUDGMENT* _ Before PHILLIPS, McHUGH, and ROSSMAN, Circuit Judges.
JEFFERSON CAPITAL SYSTEMS KANSAS COUNSELORS, INC., No. Wolpert Clerk of Court Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Appellate Case: 22-6078 Document: 010110848335 Date Filed: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT _ VANCE DOTSON, Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit ApChristopher M.
0 kommentar(er)
